A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam

Issue

Educational issue addressed in Arbitration — arbitrability of fraud.

Principle

Distinguished mere allegations of fraud (arbitrable) from serious, complex allegations of fraud (which a court may decline to refer to arbitration) when considering a s.8 reference.

Derived from Lekha's curated record for A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam (Supreme Court of India, 2016). No reporter citation is asserted here — read the judgment at the official source and confirm with a qualified advocate. Beta, pending named-expert review.

🏛️ Acts it touches

Cited by later decisions (showing 30+)

• Sohan Singh vs M/S Nitishree Infrastructures Ltd on 17 April, 2023
• Sahota Seeds Ltd vs M/S Nitishree Infrastructures Ltd on 17 April, 2023
• Sohan Singh vs M/S Nitishree Infrastructures Ltd on 17 April, 2023
• Sahota Seeds Ltd vs M/S Nitishree Infrastructures Ltd on 17 April, 2023
• Captain Sourabh Podddar vs Swo India Ltd on 15 April, 2019
• Ganesh Prasad Singh vs Swo India Ltd on 15 April, 2019
• Rajnish Kumar vs Swo India Ltd on 15 April, 2019
• Subodh Kumar Singh vs Swo India Ltd on 15 April, 2019

This judgment cites

• Section 8 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
• Section 16 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
• Section 11 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
• The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
• The Arbitration Act, 1940
• Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

A citation network shows which decisions reference this one — not whether it is still good law. Cases are cited to follow, distinguish or overrule them; verify current standing with a qualified advocate. Source: Indian Kanoon.